translated from Spanish: Applicants to the Advisory Board of Ceaip punishment ask opaque

Culiacan, Sinaloa-in Sinaloa should work in give exemplary punishments, but above all strive so that all public bodies have greater transparency on its Web pages and not only to provide the information, but that this is correct, they agreed the applicants to form part of the Advisory Council of the State Commission of access to public information (Ceaip). Also read: “El Mijis” visit Culiacan and presented their strategies as diputadoLos ten citizens who aspire to occupy one of the five chairs in this Council, they criticized that despite the advance and be Sinaloa State in first have a law for access to the In Public training, many are reluctant in making more transparent. They pledged to be the voice and represent the citizen before the Ceaip, in order to implement strategies to improve the mechanisms of transparency. Read also: the Autonomous University of Sinaloa is not in bankruptcy: rectorEsto because it cannot be allowed that entities that are opaque and only there are have been reprimanded, while they have counted with some punishment that goes beyond. Choice will be during the special session, which will begin Monday, when put to the vote in the presence of the 40 local deputies. In total there are five advisors who will integrate the Advisory Council of the caretaker body of transparency in the State. None of the five will receive any payment for the activity that will be done. How will operate the Advisory Council shall issue its internal regulation, which establishes its organization and operation, this once to initiate operations. It will only be support to the Ceaip. Every two years will be replaced the two advisers with more seniority in office. Same procedure vent in the event of ratification for a second term, thus establishes it the law on access to public information of the State of Sinaloa.Entre its powers will be the report of the Committee on the budget allocated to programs and its exercise, as well as issuing the corresponding observations; In addition to issue non-binding opinions, at the request of the Commission or on its own initiative, on relevant topics in the areas of transparency, access to information, accessibility and protection of personal data. They must also analyze and propose the execution of programs, projects and actions related to transparency and access to public information, among other faculties that will have. In this article: Sinaloa Culiacán CEAIP transparency fine punishment

Original source in Spanish