translated from Spanish: Constitutional accusation: Deputy Espinoza hard fustigates absence of “fellow” Marcelo Díaz the vote

Deputy for the Socialist Party (P) (S), Fidel Espinoza, harshly castigated his fellow Caucus, Marcelo Díaz, for not being present at the vote on the previous question in the framework of the constitutional accusation against three Ministers of the Supreme Court. 
“I have been involved in these hours, I had my mother in a serious state of health, but my commitment to human rights goes beyond even the pain of being away today day and not be accompanying it. “Not everyone in this party we have the same commitment to human rights, that will be a problem that will have to take on Marcelo Díaz with the Chilean socialism in the future”, said Espinoza of his counterpart, who left the country on vacation during this day.
The Socialist militant criticized that there is the former new majority members who do not have a commitment to human rights, referring to “those members who have not joined today to reject the previous question. We have a majority in Parliament, there is no excuse to have become a draw, because we were able to win this vote with a draw”. In addition, he argued that “the problem is not right, the problem we have it”. 
On the other hand, Espinoza said that it is likely that in this second stage, the Government intensify what has been done so far, that it is a “blatant interventionism even within members of our political sector”. 
“Here there is a concordance between a discourse where it is asking for Justice because a former President of the Republic from the ranks of the Christian Democrats was assassinated here in this country. What is the true commitment to human rights today day, negotiate with right? It is a clear negotiation with the right to tear down the constitutional accusation. We believe that this responsibility should lie in the Senate, and now, probably, with this brutal interventionism and with the permission of Parliament our, probably in one hour, right, and the Ministers who left free criminals to achieve its objective”, he said. 
The Hall of the Chamber of Deputies rejected the so-called prior issue – admissibility – of the indictment constitutional against three Ministers of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court, Hugo Dolmestch, Carlos Künsemüller and Manuel Valderrama, for granting parole to seven sentenced for violation to human rights in dictatorship. He knew that the outcome of the vote would be close, but nobody predicted what happened: 69 votes in favour to 69 against, so it gives rejected and therefore allowed to libel now pass to the next stage, that of his discussion of the Fund.

Original source in Spanish