translated from Spanish: Commission by the hurricane case extension in 15 days work to deliver conclusions

the Commission investigating the case a hurricane, Deputy Chairman of l PPD, Andrea Parra, agreed to extend its deadline in fifteen days to analyze the proposals and conclusions of the work they have done since it was founded in April.
“It was necessary to extend us a little more, because this is certainly a big issue where we want to have a deep well look regard what’s intelligence law, which says rights to privacy and violations of the rights of the” mapuche world. “We have been almost 120 days of meetings of this Committee, where we have had more than 25 guests, and also, it must be said, multiple excuses of public officials, former officials and generals”, stated the Deputy Parra.
The Parliament pointed out that it is a fact that marked a milestone in the history of the country. “This has allowed us to visualize as today, we have a law of intelligence misused, where the institutional framework has not been at the height of what it means to confront a conflict as he lives in La Araucanía”, emphasized.
The legislator said that “from my perspective, the operation hurricane was a farce from beginning to end.” We are concerned to have discovered that the brain of the unit’s intelligence police in Araucanía was a civilian whose only experience was having a workshop for police. Regarding the political responsibility we have not a very conclusive look as Commissioner, he would have liked to have the presence of the former Minister of the Interior, with the former Undersecretary, them, however, sent documents written in response to many of our consultations”, said.
“From the Chamber of Deputies what we have to do is concentrate our efforts, not to be a Court of Justice, but rather to make proposals to improve what today day has occurred. We have to reform police and intelligence system. Here dealt with the law of intelligence, which is intended to gather information for high levels of the Government and the President of the Republic, to deliver a history of judicial proceedings, and that does not correspond, there is much opacity. In addition, one wonders who controls which have to monitor things done well, who oversees the work of prosecutors, police. It is not well defined by law who monitors who,”said Andrea Parra.

Original source in Spanish