translated from Spanish: Carlos Peña: former supporters of the Yes not abandoned Pinochet but that they seek to “disguise it” father of democracy

through a letter to the director of public ADA in El Mercurio, the rector of the UDP, Carlos Peña, referred again to the plebiscite of the not, expressed in his latest column, “If counterfeit”.
One of their readers forced me to delve into the falsification of the Yes – which I meant in my last column — and the profound meaning that has”, he said, explaining that”the novel family of the neurotic”, Freud explained in” how when children discover defects parents, they elaborate catched fantasies about his childhood to hide that fact that, in the light of their maturation, seem intolerable”.
“That is exactly what happens to certain members of the right with the if to Pinochet who, with so much fervor, as well as that his reader, former Minister of the dictator who seems repented, said thirty years ago. They have changed their opinion and now try to change his past,”he says.
“(Will the enthusiasm for the continuity of Pinochet be necessary to remember who was the dictator and what he had done?); the tolerance of the Board (whose powers would be extended for nearly one year); “the prohibition of Marxist ideologies (protected democracy forgot so fast?) have been transformed suddenly into an option for democracy that deserves to be celebrated”, added.
“The problem, as the own Freud surmised, is that all that fantasy cover-up is not in fact an abandonment of Pinochet, but a way crooked and unconscious exalt it, disguise it in father of the democracy we have today!”, was completed.

Original source in Spanish