translated from Spanish: Judge sentence a woman with the harmony of a marriage

a man not takes charge of the alimony of the son who had an extramarital relationship. The boy’s mother decides to inform the spouse of the man the situation, displaying it as an irresponsible father. In response, the spouse of man demand women for moral damages and the judge fourteenth civil of the common law of the city of Mexico, Francisco René Ramírez Rodríguez, grants you the reason. Judgment to the respondent to pay 50 thousand pesos and to apologize publicly to the claimant “by affect feelings, psychological health and marital harmony” of the deceived spouse, as well as “the dignity” of the unfaithful husband.
This sentence participates in the international competition Awards gender and justice to expose 2018, in the category Club, choices that make back gender equity, along with other 14 sentences of 12 countries. It was postulated by the Organization Equis justice for women on the grounds that the judge, “in a discriminatory manner, issued criteria moral, not legal, to punish women for having a behavior that escapes the ‘morally acceptable’, and punish her way disproportionate as it intervened in a marriage to have a child with a married man and daring to tell the spouse”.
To this moral judgment of the judge will be added that never said anything about the breach of the father with the son, “that was the reason that originated that respondent contacted with the applicant that the father of his son fulfilled with what by law is which”.
The competition is summoned by the Women´s Link Worldwide Organization for the tenth consecutive year. They reward the worst and the best sentences that make it back or promote equality of gender, through a specialized jury and public vote respectively. In the 2016 Edition, Mexico took the audience award for the worst sentence, then that Judge Andrés Linares Carranza put a woman of Spanish nationality with custody of the child who had with a Mexican for “not fulfilling the traditional role of mother”.
But not everything is bad news. In the category Mallate which recognizes the best judgments are nominated 15 cases in 11 countries, including Teresa, Mexican of 35 years with infertility problems who doctors of the National Medical Center November 20 denied a treatment of reproduction because of his age. Defended by the information group reproduction elected (turn), Teresa took his case to the Supreme Court of Justice, which ruled that requiring an age limit for access to the techniques of reproduction for women in Mexico is discriminatory, considering that you part of conditions of inequality based on stereotypes.
The jury’s decision and the outcome of the vote will be announced in a week and the public has the opportunity to vote here by the statement of interest until November 22. If you want to vote for the ruling of the judge Francisco René Ramírez Rodríguez as the worst verdict of the year, you can do so here.

Original source in Spanish

Related Posts

Add Comment