city of Mexico.-coalition that pushed the candidacy of Martha Erika Alonso to the Puebla Government demanded to narrow the margin of manoeuvre of the magistrate Jose Luis Vargas, who yesterday announced that its project CTO of sentence is aimed at the annulment of the election. The representative of the Coalition for Puebla to the front and also of the national action party, Oscar Perez Cordoba Amador, filed an application for disqualification or disability before the upper Chamber of the federal Electoral Court so the judge to refrain from knowing the trial promoted by Miguel Gerónimo Barbosa Huerta, Morena candidate.” To publish a draft judgment on a matter not even discussed or resolved in a personal Twitter account, the magistrate Vargas Valdez violated the duty of confidentiality of records and incurred the ban of the knowledge of the parties or anyone else sense of any project until is resolved the respective topic (in this case not only sense, but also considerations), both referred to in article 146 of the Interior of the Court Electoral Regulations of the power Judicial the Federation”, points out the application as filed.
In addition, according to the appeal, the judge “unreasonably attracted attention to himself at the expense of institutional behavior that should govern a judge electoral function, which, in addition, casts doubt on the impartiality and the objectivity with which should” lead, then, with this publication, be prejudged the matter subjected to their knowledge, in such a way that instead of solving the political dynamics jurisdictionally, his acting has politicized further resolution of the matter.”” In the same way, striving for that duty was violated the image and prestige of the institution they belong to judicial servers is respected, avoiding at all times, with their conduct, jeopardize the independence, impartiality and objectivity of its public performance, performing the assigned tasks and discarding pressure and foreign interests, so that they refrain from support recommendations that influence the process or resolution of the questions under its authority”. The proceeding of Vargas Valdez, according to the Coalition, “violated the principles of legality, impartiality, objectivity, professionalism, independence and confidentiality”. The appeal concludes that the judge “acted arbitrary and irresponsible way to disseminate in their social networks the mentioned project, unless there is agreement of the plenary of the Chamber through institutional mechanisms – for example, on the page Internet or podiums-, omission that corroborates the targeted illegality and the need to avoid that said judge continue putting at risk the validity of the election of Governor of the State “. Information reform.
In this note:
