one of the defenders of Juan Darthés face accusations of harassment given by Calu Rivero and other actresses, Gerardo Romano, turned to the complaint of rape filed by “Thelma Fardín against the actor and spoke on the topic in dialogue with journalist Luis Novaresio.” It overwhelms me think that Juan Darthés is a rapist”, started. “It gave me anxiety. Just I was with my daughter that you have 13 years, who wants to be an actress, wearing this tissue (the abortion safe, Legal and free of charge), who knows the characters, knows the work of his father, what I think, and find it me very shocking, very painful”.
“I had opportunity to meet your home, once went with our representative Alejandro Ganelli, met her 2 children, then teenagers, and his wife, and then I met this episode which had with Calu Rivero”, said.
“It was there where Roman repensó the stance taken at first:”I approached the situation without euphemisms, trying to understand how is this to be an actor, how is the figure of the harassment legally, but I’m in a State of shock,”.” That happened with the Calu (wondering ‘why not did it before?’). It was the word of Calu without judicial complaint; one can put in the role of the violated or the rapist case, but justice is for all and due process is for everyone. But it seems to me that what I saw today in the Multiteatro as great protest, as a replacement for the institutionalised justice being ignored at some point because the judiciary does not give answers to women, exceeds the specific case of a violation,”he added.
The questions of if the subject Calu repensaba, Roman nodded: “dans it when Ana Rosenfeld resigned. I say ‘well, when the gravedigger cries, the dead will be deserved’. If you leave a professional lawyer in these circumstances it is because the testimony of a girl of 16 years is actress and mobilized all its mates has forcefulness.”
“Here there are 3 girls who talk about harassment and one of rape, you radically changes the scale of the crime” the actor, also lawyer, added that Darthés called it several months ago to thank him “because he had turned my opinions regarding what had happened”. On the other hand, he argued that if you call it today, it wouldn’t have anything to say. In this note:
