translated from Spanish: Judge Dobra Lusic accused “infamy” against him and said to regulate the press

Judge Dobra Lusic answered questions to senators prior to her vote to reach the Supreme Court. The current President of the Court of Appeals of San Miguel has suffered a series of questions after a report of Radio Bio Bio revealed that, in March of this year, Lusic failed in favor of the bank of Chile despite that it was disabled by the Supreme Court since 2 016 to know causes related to that entity financieraLuego of that, in addition it was known that the Court of Appeals of San Miguel decided to investigate the reasons why John Campos, one of his close collaborators, was appointed as alternate in the fifth notary Of that commune, even though it has a criminal record. The Minister of the Court of Appeals of Santiago exposed to the Constitution Commission, where he accused “infamy” and appealed to his 44 years of experience. The Minister of the Court of Appeals, Dobra Lusic was presented at the Senate Constitution Committee, to defend against the questioning before the Commission the judge addressed the criticism for her ruling in favor of the bank of Chile despite the inability expressed against him Imposed by the highest court in the country. In this line he was charged that even though he was disabled by the Supreme Court since 2016, the judge ruled in a civil case in favor of the bank of Chile and, in addition, a millionaire business that links to the purchase of a land to his brother and that Lusic Sold in three times its original value. In the midst of this Wednesday session, Lusic responded to these questions and said he was calm because he had “enough moral fortitude to deal with these criticisms, not to have it would not have followed in the judicial career.” Moreover, he added that he had always failed with the “conviction to do the right thing.” With regard to known information, Lusic clarified that he had kept quiet because this was “his turn to talk to the Senators.” On John Campos ruled that he had had contact with him during this last time and on the case of Banco Chile pointed out that it is a false resource that was given between a part and the court. “When the appeal is entered, the court realizes the disabilities, including mine. I have been inhabilitándome for 15 years in the Bank of Chile for a mortgage credit, “he said. He also indicated that this was cancelled. Following this, the judge aimed to regulate the press because, in his view, there would have been a cruelty against her, “a virulence,” he emphasized. He added: “If I were not a woman it would not have happened the same.”

Original source in Spanish