translated from Spanish: Uber law: Mendoza Justice dismissed another order from taxi owners

Local justice considered it to be a sound legal regulation that does not create a detriment to the activity of taxi owners and does not represent unfair competition. It should be noted that the Mobility Act, which allows the activity of the electronic platforms (such as Uber and Cabify) was sanctioned 8 months ago, and at the time it was a law that was approved by consensus in both chambers in the Legislature of Mendoza. In the ruling “Aso Association of Taxi Owners of Mendoza (Aprotam) C/Government of the Province of Mendoza p/Amparo action “, Justice considers that the chosen route (amparo) does not qualify, in the particular, as the most suitable. It remarks that “in none of the accumulated dossiers, the actors have justified the serious and irreparable damage caused to it by raising the matter by means of the declarative action of unconstitutionality”. In addition, it notes that the complaint or interest of taxi owners (Aprotam) is limited only to electronic platforms by understanding that with their inclusion in the law there would be unfair competition. Currently, there are almost 500 vehicles enabled (376 of Uber and 122 of Cabify) to work with electronic platforms, in addition the service works with normality and coexist under the exercise of the law both taxis and services of electronic platforms. This differentiates Mendoza from other places in the country, such as Buenos Aires, where the Chamber of Appeals in the Penal, contraventional and faults of the autonomous city of Buenos Aires ratified the illegality of Uber and thus can only serve taxis and remises. In this note:
LeyDeMovilidad
Uber
Aprotam

Original source in Spanish

Related Posts

Add Comment