translated from Spanish: The resignation confirms a failed government!

Every act of renunciation is an intimate, very personal privilege, which sublimates values such as dignity, congruence and self-love.As defined by the verb, renunciation means the detachment of something of its own – a loved one, a good, a project or an ideology – of which we were a part. Therefore, the size of the detachment of that project, of that good or of that ideology is, at the same time, the size of the dignity of the renouncer, of its congruence and self-love. The resignation of Carlos Urzúa confirms that the former Secretary of the Treasury was consistent with his dignity, his professional experience and his self-love; confirms that, for all this, he concluded that he should not continue as a helmsman of a ship – the Ministry of Finance – which is headed to the shipwreck because of the ignorance of President Obrador himself.That is the true message of the resignation of the former head of the Treasury; that López Obrador’s is a failed government and that the ship of which Urzúa was part is drifting and the shipwreck will be inevitable. Carlos Urzúa’s diagnosis is punctual, but at the same time it is frightening; it is proof that López Obrador is not only inexperienced, but is deceived and has committed awkwardness that has the country on the brink of bankruptcy. For example. What does it mean that “there were many economic disagreements”? What discrepancies? Who are the discrepancies with? Are you with President Obrador, with Chancellor Ebrard, with Congress? It is worth remembering that in the populist governments of Echeverría and López Portillo the economic failure was due to the stubbornness of these representatives for centralizing economic policy in the presidential house. But that’s not all. Urzúa himself lets out some clues. It says in his letter-resignation. “In this Administration, public policy decisions have been made without sufficient sustenance.”.What decisions? Did the president himself take them or were they taken by his collaborators? What sustenance does the former tax owner refer to? Urzúa is later said to be convinced that “every economic policy must be carried out on the basis of evidence, taking care of the various effects that it may have and free from all extremism, whether right or left”. The previous paragraph confirms that the economic decisions of the Government of Obrador are occurrences, without measuring negative effects and without anyone cares about the consequences. In short, what Carlos Urzúa is saying is that in the Government of Obrador we are in the hands of a handful of ignorant economic issues and that decisions are made from extremisms of that night-time and stale left that permeates between close to the pre sidente. But Charles Urzúa himself abounds. “I find the imposition of officials who have no knowledge of the Treasury unacceptable. This was motivated by influential figures of the current government with a patent conflict of interest.” That is, behind the resignations of the head of the Treasury also influenced the galloping corruption in the lopista management. Why? Because it is clear that corruption proliferates on its side of amiguism, compassion, unqualified privilege to hold public office at the highest level. to bring friends and relatives to the highest levels of the lopista government? And it was up to the former Secretary of the Treasury to denounce the pro-godly corruption of the President, in addition to “a patent conflict of interest”.Who, in the Government of Obrador, benefits from the corruption and conflict of interest reported by Urzúa? Isn’t it that corruption is over? But perhaps the central problem is the president’s blindness and deafness; his arrogance to not see and let alone hear the nonconformity of his collaborators, to which he turned into vases that today rebel. Yes, we live “the rebellion of the vases” and sooner or later it will all end in tragedy, because only those who have been mistreated leave for the free. They leave only the president, who will soon walk like “the naked king,” whom no one notices his condition. In time.



Original source in Spanish