translated from Spanish: Miriam Tinoco and the aberration of the costume of the “left” – The Opinion of Javier Lozano

Nepotism and demagoguery were part of the legacy that some contemporary profiles in our country took on; this burden that many politicians who, at the legislative level, continue to conceive of the accelerated exponent of those mechanisms that hurt the transfer of a democracy that has been flainted by the displacement of the simulation of many legislators, under the imposition of an ideological fabrication that they hypothetically champion, but that facts, are part of that handful that push their particular interests, where many of the actors navigate in the state of Michoacán.
In the LXXIV Legislature of the State Congress, agreements and political proposals have been implemented, which put the collective interest before, and only benefit the usefulness of groups that bring line or are pigeoned, because that is the intransigence they introduce in their exponential management.
The most embarrassing thing is the progressive or left-wing nature they claim to have implicit in their revolutionary genetics. That is a hesitation for society; the current situation is that this progressive scheme has been restricted, because they have learned to do politics under a pragmatism that only promotes and favors their frivolity and the massive rise of a simplistic vision.
However, there are politicians accustomed to opportunism and electoral situations. This causes exaggeration and stupor of a society that in itself has faced government instability.
Miriam Tinoco Soto, who chairs the Social Communication Committee of the LXXIV Legislature of the State Congress, has been noted by various media outlets, for having still benefited group in particular through agreements that are labeled for the item informative; at this end, Miriam Tinoco pigeoned the nearest, and excluded many of the local media that for years perceived conventions to disseminate the activities and programs of the LXXIV legislature; that speaks of deep insensitivity, and democratic incongruity. Why is there a standoff with many of the local media that perceived a convention for dissemination?, Why does it benefit only select group?, Why is there unequal and inequitable treatment?, Why in some media expands the conventions with exorbitant figures? why do they embrace an ideology according to them on the left, Why do they always wait for political tessituras to sneak in and negotiate spaces?, Why do they go from party to party according to interest?, Why aren’t they consistent with speech and facts? some yes, and some don’t?
It is distressing to see the insensitivity of these characters who at one time championed the frequent linguistics of the left; politically I find it incongruous, wrong and biased.
By the way, this legislator, a while ago she assumed the title of the Secretary of Social Development in the State in the current administration, but then resigned because she accused “that she would not be responsible for the inoperability of the most ambitious program of this administration”: Future Scholarship. This management was plagued by irregularities that were weighed by the Higher Audit of Michoacán, which would jeopardize the operation of this project. The flaking of this program always had operational inconsistencies, and above all system failures. But she was responsible; then it seems clear that there was a disability that did not land on a clear landscape that would guide a project that, in particular, seemed to open the gap to millions of young people in the wreck of social inequality.
Miriam Tinoco resigned from the PRD; party that set him the most comfortable way to get to Congress on the multi-member ground. It was clearly a skillful strategy, because the reading of the re-accommodated within the PRD did not benefit personally a growing post-project aspiration. Now, it navigates the “Independent” route, but it will surely have a adherence to the exodus of the Lopezobradorita phenomenon that has pulled the social impact in many of the states, where disdain for the party has reached the limits of anger.
But those promising new scenarios that drive the 2021 candidacy will be the challenge to adapt to the failure they have been dragging on since the party of the democratic revolution; however, they have shown, above all, that progressive projects are what interest them least; here the important thing is to look for spaces and conjunctures that the future party transition produces. The galloping climate of these selective policies is symptomatic of that left-wing simulation.
Indeed, several lawmakers, who are now “Independent” deputies, promoted the correlation with this fateful alliance with the PAN and for Michoacán at the helm: what a shame.
That paradoxical, now they embody the progressive flag. It seems late to me, because there is a sharp and zero credibility of society, which has found that they are moving from one place to another, only to seek and hang themselves from the social struggles that produce various expressions such as MORENA.
The opinions expressed in the columns are the sole responsibility of those who subscribe to them and do not necessarily represent the thought or editorial line of Monitor Expresso

Original source in Spanish