translated from Spanish: Judge denies Robles suspension against litigation

Rosario Robles, former owner of Sedesol and Sedatu, will continue to be linked to the process for accusations of improper exercise of public service related to the Case The Master Scam, so its legal process will take its course.
This, after a federal judge refused to grant a final suspension after the protection brought by Robles’ defense, with which he tried to ‘spoil’ the bond decreed last August by the control judge Felipe de Jesús Delga Padierna.
Find out: Judge will decide next Tuesday whether to keep or revoke pre-trial detention in Rosario Robles
The defence sought under this protection that the indictment against Rosario Robles by the Attorney General of the Republic should not continue, that the parties not be summoned at the next interim hearing of the case, which is likely to take place next February, and that the phase of the opening of the trial would not be cited.
However, the Ninth Collegiate Court in Criminal Matters of the First Circuit, considered it inappropriate to grant the final suspension to Rosario Robles, since doing so would “cause harm to the social interest”.
In addition, it noted that proceedings against Robles could only be suspended once the intermediate stage of the legal process, which ranges from the formulation of the indictment to the order for the opening of the trial, the legal stage to which the case of the ex-worker has not yet been reached, could be suspended.
“Therefore, the injunction cannot be granted for the purposes desired by the disgruntled, that is, that the parties are not charged, the parties are not summoned to the interim hearing and the order for the opening of the trial is not issued, so that the alleged in this regard is unfounded,” the Court’s ruling document stated.
Read: Rosario Robles asks Deputies to dismiss impeachment against him for being ‘inappropriate’
This resolution dismisses one of Robles’ defence strategies, which seeks to secure the freedom of the ex-workeria in two different ways: ‘attacking’ the self-linking order with a cover which was now rejected- and trying to revoke the pre-trial detention measure imposed on it by Judge Delgadillo Padierna.
As for that second ‘front’, Rosario Robles’ defense also set out, at an appeal hearing in Reclusorio Norte, a series of arguments from which he seeks to prove that Judge Padierna’s decision to pre-emptively imprison Rosario Robles on the grounds that there was a flight risk is “unfounded and violating human rights”.
Read MaS: Rosario Robles defends her innocence before the judge and asks to follow her process freely
After the hearing that was held this morning, in which the Attorney General’s Office also set out its counterarguments and accused both the exoperating officer and her team of lawyers of lying repeatedly in the legal process, the judge Isabel Cristina Porras will decide within three working days whether to maintain, revoke, or modify the pre-trial detention against Rosario Robles.
But, whatever the decision of the magistrate, the legal process of the case will continue with the interim hearing that will take place in February, after today Robles’ defense announced that it requested another two months of extension to complete the investigation of the case, the initial deadline of which ended this Friday, December 13.
What we do in Animal Político requires professional journalists, teamwork, dialogue with readers and something very important: independence. You can help us keep going. Be part of the team.
Subscribe to Animal Politician, receive benefits and support free journalism.#YoSoyAnimal

Original source in Spanish

Related Posts

Add Comment