The federal judge of Lomas de Zamora, Federico Villena, began to take the inquest statements part of the case for alleged illegal espionage. Much of yesterday’s day was the shift of former federal Intelligence Agency (AFI) agents investigated by physical follow-up maneuvers during the Government of Mauricio Macri.Near 22 o’am the beginning of the inquiry statement by former Presidential Documentation Coordinator Susana Martinengo was still awaiting, noted as the one who received in Casa Rosada part of the reports produced by the spies grouped in a whatsapp group called “Super Mario Bros”. One of the former spies she declared was Mercedes Funes Silva who confirmed that she had visited the Casa Rosada on a 6-minute occasion to bring documentation to the presidential documentation office for whom she now recognizes as Martinengo, Télam collected.
His defense strategy, as well as that of other spies, was to mark that he received orders through the now-detained Alan Ruiz, former head of Special Operations, who taught and distributed them among all the agents and that only he and his superiors could know that the information would stop be filers that, fully seen, would confirm illegal political espionage. Judge Villena accused detainees in the case of alleged illegal espionage from the AFI in macrism, of being part of an “organization with insertion into the National, Provincial and Local State” dedicated to the “abusive and systematized use of illegal investigative means”. The charges are arising from the allegation read yesterday to the accused in search and in which they were accused of being part of “an organization with insertion into the National, Provincial and Local State, composed of an undetermined number of people, among whom were public officials and agents of different Security and Intelligence Forces”. The causes
On 26 May last, the intervention of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (AFI), Cristina Caamaño, filed a complaint for alleged illegal espionage where she requested the inquiry from former President Mauricio Macri “in her capacity as being responsible for setting the strategic guidelines and general objectives of national intelligence policy”. The request was extended to the former owner of the AFI, Gustavo Arribas and his second Silvia Majdalani, both part of the administration during the administration We change and already imputed in the case. Registered under number 2916/2020 and alluding to crimes of “correspondence violation” and “computer system violation”, the complaint marks an alleged illegal espionage that would have been initiated since at least June 2, 2016 on private emails of at least 80 injured. Finally, from its ramifications, three federal judges are investigating illegal espionage maneuvers in various forms that occurred during the Change administration, with the common denominator suspected in all cases of the role the AFI played.
Two of the cases are based in the federal courts of Comodoro Py, in courts by the aforementioned judge Marcelo Martínez de Giorgi. The third is in the hands of the federal judge of Lomas de Zamora, Federico Villena, who has already begun to inform the eventual victims about the evidence collected in his file, what is the difference? In the case investigated in Lomas de Zamora, hand-to-hand follow-up maneuvers are discussed by political leaders of the highest hierarchy such as Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, his son Máximo, the head of Government of Buenos Aires Horacio Rodríguez Larreta and his deputy head, Diego Santilli.In the other two files, opened by Caamaño’s complaints, more than 80 interceptions of emails whose traces were found on a hard drive found at the headquarters of the spy headquarters are investigated; while the other examines whether the Agency intervened in the preparation of ideological tokens of some 500 journalists and academics who were accredited to participate in G20 and WTO summits held in Argentina during the presidency of Mauricio Macri.
In this note: