translated from Spanish: Salgado can lose track for not delivering expense report: TEPJF

Félix Salgado Macedonio and the other morenistas who aspired to the candidacy for guerrero’s government intended to defraud the law because they did pre-campaign and did not submit to the National Electoral Institute (INE) reports of income and expenses, confirms a draft sentence of Judge Reyes Rodríguez Mondragón.
The proposal, which will be voted on on Friday in public session of the Superior Chamber, tops down the party’s repeated allegations that they never pre-camped, or that they did deliver their expense reports, but extemporaneously.
Although Judge Rodríguez Mondragón attested to the failure to impede the inE’s auditing powers, the draft judgment considers that the electoral arbitrator overspired to impose as a penalty all applicants, equally, the cancellation or loss of the right to register as candidates.
Read: Felix Salgado and Mario Delgado protest outside TEPJF; expect decision in your favor
The project orders the INE to gradually individualize the sanction to be made by Félix Salgado, Adela Román, Luis Walton and Pablo Amílcar Sandoval. 
The proposal states that the electoral arbitrator should consider other punishments such as public reprimand or fine, but makes it clear that the INE may re-impose the cancellation or loss of the right to registration of applicants, if each case so warrants.
In fact, this measure opens up the possibility that, if it is confirmed that Salgado cannot be a candidate for failures to audit regulations, it may be replaced in the candidacy by other morenists who participated in the internal contest.
“In order to do the above, the INE must start from the following premises established and justified in the present executor: The applicants of Morena in Guerrero subject to this controversy are material and formally pre-candidates and, therefore, their activities, must be classified as acts of precampaña.
Find out: Felix Salgado challenges INE ruling before TEPJF: I was never a pre-party, he argues
“In the case, there is no out-of-time submission, as the reports submitted by Morena and her pre-candidates were made after their review or verification was feasible, so the faults committed by both Morena and her pre-candidates were the non-submission of the report and not the out-of-time submission of the reports,” the draft ruling states.
Judge Rodríguez Mondragón’s proposal states that, in order to determine the irregularities committed by the applicants and the party, the INE should consider their willingness to submit their expense report within the time limit set out in the electoral rule, whether this allowed the authority to exercise its supervisory power and whether it warned of an intentionality to cover up the violation of the law.
This assessment can be especially damaging to the morenists, because, after repeatedly denying that they never pre-camped, they delivered their reports almost a month late, and, in Salgado’s case, went so far as to deny that he was the person who appeared in photos and videos that the NSO valued as evidence of his proselytizing acts.
What we do at Animal Politics requires professional journalists, teamwork, dialogue with readers and something very important: independence. You can help us keep going. Be part of the team.
Subscribe to Animal Politics, receive benefits and support free journalism.#YoSoyAnimal

Original source in Spanish