translated from Spanish: magistrates deny and sell themselves to criminals


Journalist Lydia Cacho accused the magistrates who granted protection to Kamel Nacif Borge before the arrest warrant against him for denying the truth that was confirmed with data and selling himself to organized crime. After learning of the announcement of the amparo granted to the businessman, who is accused of being one of the intellectual authors of the torture inflicted on her person, the activist regretted and questioned the decision of the magistrates and the magistrate of the Third Collegiate Court in the state of Quintana Roo.In her speech from Spain, where she stressed that she is in exile for this case Cacho questioned the change of the people in charge of the case a month and a half ago before the transparent and ethical trial that the previous judge was conducting. Read more: Court grants amparo to Kamel Nacif against arrest warrant; is accused of torturing Lydia Cacho”Who made the determination within the Judicial Branch of the Federation to change this magistrate and put two magistrates who know publicly their direct relationship with the PRI, with Roberto Borge Angulo, the former governor of Quintana Roo, also accused of links to organized crime and other acts of corruption?” , the journalist questioned. Treason and backtracking The activist called for the positive resolution of the amparo as a betrayal of all the people involved in the crimes she has reported.” Once again, the Judiciary of the Federation betrayed all these girls, whom we have defended through my journalistic work and defense of Human Rights and, of course, me and all the other victims of torture, persecution and all the journalists who have received death threats” Said. With azoro, it was as Cacho described the reception of the determination, which he classified as a temporary setback at the beginning of the case. “After 16 years of seeking justice for having tortured me and after reading the determination, all I can say is that I felt like we traveled back in time to the past. The determination and argumentation of these judges is virtually identical to that of the first corrupt judge who started taking my case 16 years ago,” he said. The first resolution, he recalled, argued that he was not a journalist, as well as that “The Demons of Eden,” a book where he explains how Kamel Nacif’s alleged money laundering network works, was a libel and not a journalistic investigation, so evidence was collected to show the veracity of what was narrated. “16 years later, we demonstrated before international organizations and, above all, before the Mexican courts and before other bodies and prosecutors’ offices, that all the evidence in my book is authentic, true and that it represents a reality of international networks of human trafficking, organized crime, money laundering,” he argued in the face of the rejection of the information by the magistrates. The judges’ decision, he said, was a blow to the files, which dispelled evidence provided by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) about Kamel Nacif Borge’s ties to money laundering, human trafficking and ties to organized crime. Read more: Congress of the Union could call an extraordinary period, says Ricardo MonrealLydia Cacho also pointed out that such actions occur at a time of political alliances and questioned the apology offered by President Andrés Manuel López Obrador when he pointed out that there are people in the political power of the Government of Mexico, the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic and the Judicial Branch of the Federation who manage and protect the denounced criminal networks.” To wipe the slate clean of a file that for 16 years has been built with the truth and on the truth is a sign that nothing has changed,” he lamented. Renamed Claudia Sheinbaum Plaza de la Noche Victoriosa in CDMX



Original source in Spanish

Related Posts

Add Comment