translated from Spanish: Judge of the Supreme defended figure of probation

the judge of the Supreme Court, Carlos Künsemüller, defended in a letter to El Mercurio, the figure of the conditional liberties, in the midst of the controversy over the benefic IO the second Chamber of the Court given to convicted of crimes against humanity.
Künsemüller is, indeed, part of the room, and one of the three judges against a group of opposition deputies announced a constitutional accusation.
“The most renowned representatives of the Chilean penal doctrine of the modern era coincide with the Professor Enrique Cury that”who is on parole has continued to serve his sentence, only means that it meets it differently,”said the” Minister of the Court.
“Enough to reaffirm, revise the views of Labatut Glena, Etcheberry, Politoff, Matus and Ramirez, Bullemore and McKinnon, none of which can be identified with positions contrary to the unrestricted respect for human rights,” he added.
Citing another criminal (Eduardo Novoa Monreal), judge paraphrased that “legally, probation is not a way to reduce or shorten the sentence or send a part of it: how long it is kept, but instead are held in the” “penal establishment, accomplished means being out of this use of the benefit”.

Original source in Spanish