translated from Spanish: Judgment in case Riggs forces family Pinochet to return more than US$ 1,600,000 and condemns three military (r)

in divided into the frame of the Riggs case, ruling the Second Chamber of the Supreme Court ordered the confiscation of an amount of US$ 1.621.554,46 of property of Augusto Pinochet or any of their societies and sentenced to 3 military retreat for his responsibility for the crime of misappropriation of public funds.
The instance composed of Ministers Milton Juica, Carlos Künsemüller, Gloria Ana Chevesich, Andrea Muñoz and Jorge Dahm hosted the inferred appeal against the ruling that had acquitted the convicts and revoked the seizure of first instance decreed by Minister Manuel Antonio Valderrama. The resolution was not signed by Minister Juica by have ceased their functions, although it was present in a view of the cause and agreement of the ruling.
With this resolution, the Court “removed” goods to the Pinochet family in the multi-million-dollar amount ($1.073.468.748 pesos chienos), so forcefully make you return this amount, in order that the State pay part of the debt by the embezzlement of public funds set up in this emblematic case of corruption on the bulky heritage of the former dictator.
The judgment of the highest court sentenced Gabriel Vergara Cifuentes, Juan Ricardo Mac-Lean Vergara and Eugenio Castillo Cádiz to 4 years in prison, with the benefit of probation, for his responsibility for the crime of misappropriation of public funds.
Also, the doomed Mac-Lean Vergara and Castle Cadiz must pay a fine of 11 UTM (monthly tax unit).
The decision was taken with the vote against Minister cisterns, “only insofar as it confirms and approves the decision of condemnation of Vergara Cifuentes, Mac-Lean Vergara and Castle Cadiz for the crime of misappropriation of public funds and, consequentially, is” It imposes on them the penalty of confiscation”, says the resolution.
Also consists in the ruling preventing the Minister Chevesich, who “participates in decisive, but considering as a time of suspension of the legal term necessary to declare the prescription of the criminal action, that that statement was taken to the” accused as accused.”

Original source in Spanish