translated from Spanish: The victory of hatred…! | THE DEBATE

against what many imagined, finally the March of protest – motejada as “fifi March”-, the consultation was conducted “duckling” which served to justify the fall of the NAIM. The protest was successful not by the number of participants – the estimates range between five and 10 thousand people, but because those five or 10 thousand citizens stepped Angel to socket – with banners and rants, despite rabid campaign of hatred; Despite the discredit and disqualification in networks against a social sector which, according to the political correctness of the future Government, should be scorned, humiliated and crushed. “Moreover, the passage of the quota not few curious – stationed dozens of way strategic, seemed instructed to sow”slogans”against migrants, the poor and to launch direct provocations to the dealers.” Pinches fifis, now if they leave, but they didn’t say anything when Calderon and Peña massacred thousands of Mexicans…! “, shouted”observers”of the March, in both lopistas as Epigmenio Ibarra placed messages in networks, identical.

The protesters gathered in the Plaza de la Constitucion. Photo reform “petty bourgeois, were silent when we protest by”NO more blood”and Calderon dead!”. They arengaban others, also in line with the slogan of lopistas journalists who dismissed the March, in real time. And against the harangues of the protesters – who protesting the duckling ‘consultation’, against the authoritarianism of the Government of Lopez Obrador and shouted in favor of the legality–an absence was worrying… Did not appear big media, television stations and newspapers called “national”. Conspicuous by their absence the show coverage and only the shy presence of apprentices of reporter was visible. And, when media coverage is responsible for the substitute or the apprentice, it is because the medium “mother is worth to him”. It was clear media slogan: low profile when”fifi”. Some, even, focused his attention on sown banners, intending to exalt the perception that it was a class struggle; poor against rich; good against evil. And it is that in March it was clear that – as we have said here – the cancellation of the NAIM was not an act to ratify the authority of AMLO, but an authoritarian gesture which sought to widen the gap between rich and poor, the hatred between the have-nots and those who have more. The NAIM is an emblem of opulence and prosperity, at the time that the perception of millions is that this is a unique, exclusive and even offensive, transportation because never will be used by the poor. Why many applaud its cancellation, and that as the GEA polls reveal that the fall of the NAIM raised ratings of Lopez Obrador.En Fund are witnessing the triumph of hatred and the defeat of the policy; I hate that he also appeared in the bread, where the contest for his leadership was a battle of hatred. That is why the resignation of Felipe Calderón bread. At the same time. In this note:

Original source in Spanish