translated from Spanish: High school students reject the imputation to the parents by the jacks

Buenos Aires Attorney Carlos Rolero Santurian charged 43 mothers and fathers of students who took eight schools last year, arguing that they are “responsible” for the co nductas of their children, and whose violations can face fines of up to 10 thousand pesos or public utility works. The Minister of education of the city of Buenos Aires, Soledad Acuña, held the measure that sets a precedent, since it is the first time makes a criminal allegation against parents by the behavior of their children. However, in the student field resolution was rejected. “Les students secundaries we position ourselves as subjects of law, as indicated in the law 16.061 Integral Protection of rights of children, girls and adolescents.” In this way, we mobilise every year by build a better education for todes”, said Joaquin Santucho, President of the Center for students of Juan Pedro Esnaola and referent of the Base Coordinator of students involved in the conflict. 

“The measures such as the outlets of schools would be avoided very easily if the Government guaranteed our rights.” The right to education is violated when there are vacancies, there are no enough schools, building conditions are terrible, and comprehensive Sexual education law is not fulfilled”Santucho called also”preserve the identity of those affected to avoid conflicts legal with their declarations”. Tamara Goldzamd, former student of Mariano Moreno that was part of the disputed measures, said: “the Minister of education seeks to build a full of lies hate speech. “Its objective is that les students do not fight for our right to public education or develop educational proposals, but that we find ourselves atemorizades the persecution carried out against us”. Alan Nadal, student of Mariano Moreno was also expressed in that sense and reference of Wolf loose: “is clearly the political intention of the measure and the doublespeak that the Minister gives Acuña: a year ago commented that Protocol in the case of Thomas would apply through” responsibility to fathers and mothers if there is any breakage or damage to the property, now turns out that the reason is to ‘prevent entry into public spaces’ “.”
“The Government seeks to demonize us with campaigns of hate and fear; framing this decision in the electoral context”.
In this note: schools education intakes

Original source in Spanish