translated from Spanish: Boric again insists against Jiles: “In the few ideas he has expressed, we disagree”

“Politics should not be guided by circumstantial popularitys, but by convictions. With Deputy Jiles we have very different convictions.” Once again, Social Convergence Deputy and Presidential Pre-Candidate Gabriel Boric again disenlisted from the humanist DEPUTY, who leads the presidential polls.
“In the few ideas he has expressed, we disagree. We do not agree to return to the death penalty, we do not agree that the silver of withdrawals has to go back to the AFPs, we want a new public pension system not for profit. The differences in the few ideas known to him are very substantive,” he said on Infinite Radio.
The standard-bearer of Social Convergence, Democratic Revolution and Common Force remains focused on the signature collection process, so that he can register his candidacy in the primaries. However, you do not have up-to-date data regarding the number of rubrics you have to date.
“Even the Servel doesn’t tell us how many signatures we carry (…) we’re not sure how many are missing, but we estimate that between 12,000 and 15,000 signatures are missing,” he said.
Regarding the competition to come, Boric reiterated that “I would love a primary with Paula Narváez and Daniel Jadue”, but admitted that “a broad primary is very difficult and that there are many people who are afraid of losing to Daniel (Jadue)”.
According to the PARLIAMENTarian, “my position is that the Broad Front must be in the primary” and he again brazened a plan B from the party if he fails to get the signatures together. “I want to be clear in saying that Social Convergence is not going to raise any candidacy other than mine,” he said.
Also, on the opposition, he reflected: “We need to be more self-cryptic with our sector and seek to convene rather than believe that we all know them all.”
On the issue of the common lows debated between the Government and Congress, the parliamentarian insisted on the Universal Basic Income approach: “At this point, continuing to postpone universal aid does much more harm to the country and the economy (…) I don’t care who’s in the picture and what mechanism it’s used.”

Original source in Spanish