Death of Natacha Jaitt: they will ask for the exhumation of her body and the nullity of an expertise

Exactly four years and three months after the death of Natacha Jaitt, her defense will request the exhumation of her body and the nullity of an expert pointing out that “there was manipulation in the autopsy” that was carried out. This was confirmed by Ulises Jaitt in dialogue with the program In the afternoon (America TV), where they announced that “they are going to ask for the nullity of the expertise made by 18 health professionals who were aware of analyzing Natacha’s viscera.” That report reportedly reported that the victim had “myocardiofibrosis.” However, her brother said that he has the result of some studies that she carried out three months earlier, which would prove otherwise.” His heart was in perfect condition,” said the communicator and driver through his mobile phone. “I have studies of a Doppler echo that says there is no obvious heart disease and an electrocardiogram. The expert had it seen by a cardiologist of his team and that he confirmed ‘this could not have happened’ (in relation to myocardiofibrosis) that should have appeared in the studies I had.” They tricked the autopsy and this is one more irregularity, very serious, “added Ulises, who again reiterated the complaints to the prosecutor’s office that he has been making for “corruption” in the investigation. For his part, his lawyer who represents him in the case, Gustavo D’Elía, said that “he asked for the autopsy” to “prove that the diagnosis that the autopsy says is false.” Luis Ventura revealed that he had access to Natacha Jaitt’s iPadThe journalist, who was hosting the program instead of Karina Mazzocco, said he had a meeting with Natacha and that she offered him the content she saved on her device. At the same time, he also acknowledged having been the first to spread the images of his body, which went viral and generated the reaction of his brother. He came to offer me a lot of material, in a meeting in a bar located in Honduras and Fitz Roy. At one point I asked him to get a little further away because it was a lot of information. In that talk she also slipped that at some point someone could attempt against her life, “said Ventura, while mentioning that “for a security issue” she did not accept the information, that in the programs where she worked “they did not merit publishing” images of those characteristics and clarified: “I was looking for another type of material.” In Filo.News we analyze in this note the dangerousness of the publication of her images and in this special available in Filo.policial she asks: did she die or was she killed? Watch it below.

Original source in Spanish