Civic-ARI Coalition leader Elisa Carrió made headlines again for her statements. In dialogue with LN+, the legislator left to point out that in the group of La Cámpora “there are many addicts”, while considering that the official leaders Emilio Monzó and Rogelio Frigerio “underestimate the president” Mauricio Macri.” It’s not all of La Cámpora. There are people and people from La Cámpora who not only have ties to drug trafficking, but there are also many addicted people. But it’s not all of La Cámpora. This from saying ‘La Cámpora’ when I say corrupt I say (Ricardo) Jaime, (July) De Vido”, marked Carrió after knowing the statements of the nun Martha Pelloni who linked the group to drug trafficking.” Axel Kicillof is not on the drug. And to say he’s on drugs because he’s in La Cámpora is a lie. Now… Kicillof is that he delivered YPF,” he raised in reference to the pre-candidate for governor on the Front Of All.
On the other hand, Carrió again pointed to Emilio Monzó and Rogelio Frigerio, arguing that they “underestimate the President”. “Operators think they’re political and they’re not to be in the dark. I am defending the President of the Republic and I have been tired of hearing that the President is not political and that the shortcomings he has is that he does not allow himself to be advised by the political wing. Macri is a politician,” he delved into this point. Already in reference to the election campaign is that the Deputy questioned the leader of the Renewal Front, Sergio Massa, considering that the tigrense “dissolved”.” Massa was a construction of Paolo Rocca that deflated. I didn’t know where to go. It was a creation of the media, as (Francisco) De Narváez. A media creation. Even Paolo Rocca installed him as a candidate for President. Then I’ll take it down and the president puts it back up. And then he takes it to Davos,” Lilita proposed.Ultimately, and since the death of former President Fernando De la Rúa it was that he marked that the radical suffered “a blow from here to China, he was very betrayed by radicalism himself and conditioned” by the “establishment” Economic. In this note:
