Cristina Fernández de Kirchner on the Court: “We need a serious arbitrator so that we are all equal before the law”

Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner reappeared on the public scene in the midst of the conflict between the national government and the City of Buenos Aires over the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (CSJN) that orders to increase the mass of co-participable funds to 2.95%. In this context, the former president warned about the need for “there to be a serious arbitrator who applies the law and has a guarantee for everyone that everyone is equal before the law.” Macri modified with a simple decree what was the national government of co-participation and gave a lot to the government of the city, the richest city in Argentina. What he took from that portion that goes to the provinces he gave to the City. And then, this, which had been discussed and criticized by all the governors of the country, was resolved with another decree of the Government of Alberto Fernández, but it did not remain in a simple decree. There was a law of Congress that consecrated that decree and that new distribution of income, “said the two-time president of the nation at the inauguration ceremony of a sports complex Diego Armando Maradona in the Buenos Aires party of Avellaneda.However, the Vice President warned that the Court “ignored a law”, for which she argued: “Laws cannot be suspended, the only one that can do that is Congress, which sanctions them. The judiciary may declare it unconstitutional.” At the ceremony in Villa Corina, the former president was accompanied by Buenos Aires Governor Axel Kicillof and Avellaneda Mayor Jorge Ferraresi, before whom she indicated that Argentina is facing an “ajuridical fact,” “as if the rule of law had disappeared.” This may seem like a discussion between politicians. But that judicial party influences the quality of life of citizens. You have to wake up. When they rip your head off with the cell phone bill, internet, cable, it is because there was a judge who issued an Amparo so that they are not public service. The same happened with the prepaid, “said Fernández de Kirchner. Fernández de Kirchner reappeared after the sentence in the trial mediated as “Vialidad” in which the Federal Oral Court No. 2 sentenced her to 6 years in prison and perpetual inhibition from holding public office, for which she affirmed that her refusal to be a candidate in 2023 has nothing to do with a “resignation” or “self-exclusion”: “Let’s talk straight here there is proscription,” he said. “What they did was set up a trial with complaints, with an almost surgical electoral chronology. After a three-year armed trial, they decided that the oral trial in which they were going to seat me in the dock was on May 21, 2019. Fifteen days before the closing of the electoral deadlines to assemble the electoral fronts where the Presidency of the Nation would be disputed. Three days earlier, I dismantled that maneuver when I announced that we were going to a front with the president of the Argentine Republic. It was a clear proscriptive maneuver,” said the vice president.

Original source in Spanish

Related Posts

Add Comment