The minister spokeswoman of the Supreme Court, Ángela Vivanco Martínez, explained that the highest court opened a collaborative work between the government and the isapres to comply with the ruling that regulated the tables of factors and that the decision implies that the private health system subsists with the limitations established by the ordinary courts and the Constitutional Court.
The magistrate addressed the issue in the usual spokeswoman, recalling that the Supreme Court granted a period of six months for the Superintendence and the isapres to agree on the mechanisms of compliance with the ruling. In addition, he reiterated that when resolving an appeal for clarification in a short time, it was sought to speed up the matter.
You may also be interested in:
“The judges cannot go to review each of the plans, each of the prices and say this is too much, and so on. That task does not correspond to us, much less in the headquarters of protection, which is a precautionary headquarters. In such a way that this, I believe, is a joint work that must be addressed both by the State from the point of view of the Superintendence and also of the Isapres in order to adequately comply with the ruling, “said Vivanco.
The spokeswoman for the highest court added that the court did not want to say how, precisely so that there is sufficient ductibility. “We have said on many occasions that the idea is that the private health system subsists and can comply with these guidelines that seem to us guidelines that, in addition, have been designed over time. They are not sudden things, but now in this ruling in some way those guidelines are condensed or concretized and now what must be done is to establish the modes of compliance, “he said.
For this, “we have already clarified the date, they know what are the issues that are at stake and I believe that there are the different capacities of the system to agree in a possible way for all, but at the same time that means respect for a judicial ruling that has to be complied with,” said Angela Vivanco.
“We have tried to establish guidelines and interpretations that go behind a proper unification of the way in which the norms are being interpreted, the way that the ruling of the Constitutional Court, which is already 13 years old, is being interpreted. In such a way that the private health system has the greatest clarity regarding the rules to which to abide. We were asked for a clarification of the ruling of the isapres that we are talking about, and precisely for the sake of being able, once again, to collaborate so that this situation can be solved as soon as possible, in a very short time we responded to that request for clarification regarding two points and the other clarifying that it was not appropriate to say anything because it was an issue that exceeded what the ruling referred to. ” explained the minister of the Supreme.
The authority reaffirmed that the ruling is not an impediment for the system to continue operating, but a legal framework to guarantee the rights of all actors, especially people.
“We would like that hopefully not about the ruling there is an entrapment, but on the contrary, that the ruling is somehow a from, an important point on the table so that ultimately, the agreements can be taken and everything that from the point of view of the Administration implies complying with the ruling is developed, but at the same time also, as has been said on many occasions, protect the rights of the people who are involved, who are affiliated to the system and of course, also fulfill the obligations of the system with doctors, with providers, etc., in such a way that this does not mean a collapse, but that it means a from which we must build a way to solve this problem, complying with this ruling, which is a judicial ruling that has to be complied with,” concluded the magistrate at that point.
Follow us on
