translated from Spanish: Linked to process to Lamar

Sedatu, Enrique González Tiburcio, Lamar was linked to process the possible Commission of the crime of falsification of statement, every time that a federal judge determined that the firm registered in the agreement with the Universidad Politécnica Francisco I. Madero, which resulted in the alleged diversion of public resources, is in”your own handwriting” and was not falsified, as had denounced the ex.
At the request of the Attorney General’s Office (FGR), federal judge Orlando Íñiguez Delgadillo also imposed measures precautionary, which consist of the ex to go to sign to court every 15 days and the prohibition to leave the country without permission of the authority judicial.
The bonding process means that the judge considered that the evidence is sufficient to mark it as a possible responsible for having “missed the truth” by saying that his signature was falsified, so continue to the criminal proceedings against and both the FGR as the Defense of the accused will present more evidence during the next three months, for the next hearing set in April.
On Monday, Animal politician revealed that Gonzalez Tiburcio, who was Assistant Secretary of Territorial Planning during the administration of Rosario Robles in urban and Territorial Development secretariat, is one of the former officials of higher level involved in a Convention which resulted in the alleged diversion of public resources, known as master scam.
However, his lawyer Julio Hernandez Barros explained that the ex detected that his signature was forged following a request for information on the 11 April 2017, when a citizen requested the document that home was declared as non-existent because no is It was in the file of the Undersecretary. Citizen lodged an appeal for review with the INAI, and officials of the Sedatu did an exhaustive search, said Convention located in another area.
Therefore, alleged falsification of the firm was denounced by Tiburcio Gonzalez before the body internal of Control (OIC) of the Sedatu June 9, 2017, and hours later made a statement to the same instance.
A month later, the OIC filed a complaint to the then Attorney General of the Republic (PGR) for falsification of signature against who is responsible. It was just as he began the investigation with respect to that Convention, as holding the defense.
Tuesday Gonzalez Tiburcio attended third hearing of the case carried out in the Centre of Federal Criminal Justice in the city of Mexico, Reclusorio Norte, where his defense offered evidence to verify the alleged falsification of his signature, while lawyers the Prosecutor’s office, Prosecutor, tried to prove otherwise.
The hearing dealing with a public hearing as part of the procedure of the new accusatory penal system, Animal politician could be present and listen to the arguments of each party and the conclusions of the judge.
Among the evidence of the prosecution was the opinion of one of their experts in Graphology who concluded that the signature Yes corresponded to the ex. In addition, the exrector of the University Polytechnic Francisco I. Madero, Juan de Dios Nochebuena went to appear and confirmed the agreement between the unit and the educational institution 4 January 2016.
The defense of the ex presented the opinion of the external expert in Graphology “Elba”, who argued that the signature was forged, although during his presentation said that the date of the document that had broken down was December 4, 2016, making it the Prosecutors pointed out the error.
Judge Orlando Íñiguez was considered to be such exposure and opinion not well-supported as he could not even explain the methodology that had been followed for the conclusion that the signature was forged, in addition to the confusion of the date put in interdict their analysis.
This, coupled with the Declaration of the exrector Christmas Eve was proof enough for the judge to link Gonzalez Tiburcio process. Even in the argumentation of his decision, the judge explained that the ex had “missed the truth” to denounce the alleged forgery of the signature on the document, every time that the expert of the Prosecutor’s Office concluded that the heading was “in your own handwriting”.
Despite the fact that the complaint before the internal organ of Control of the Sedatu took place in June 2017, the judge considered that it was probably a strategy of the Lamar to exonerate of any future research, given that this agreement led to another agreement through which allegedly 185 million pesos of public funds of the Sedatu deviated. Therefore, it was determined that there is matter for further investigation the accused.
In the SEDATU-UPFIM/SOT/05/2016 agreement, obtained by Animal politician via transparency, had as objective “the dissemination and application of scientific and technical knowledge in the implementation of projects and actions in the field of land management, development regional, urban and metropolitan, gender equity and rural property and agricultural development, in fulfilment of its institutional purposes”.
To accomplish this, as set forth in the fifth clause, “parties” agreed the realization specific agreements through their respective representatives. This was the case. The SEDATU/DGAPADN-UPFIM/33901.03/2016 specific agreement was signed February 2, 2018 between rector Juan de Dios Nochebuena and Armando Saldaña, CEO, Ordenamiento Territorial of the Sedatu, subordinate of Gonzalez Tiburcio.
In the annex to that Convention was established the payment of up to 224 billion pesos, although only 185 million pesos were paid. University subcontracted companies for allegedly performing the services, however, treated irregular companies, as the Federation’s top audit in the 196-DS audit determined.
To check the path of the money, the audit found “simulation of engagements and presentation of services”, “apocryphal” vouchers, triangulation of resources with enterprises ‘ role”involved with other universities and even payments to officials of 23 Government agencies.
Therefore, to consider that there was an alleged diversion of 185 million pesos, the audit, filed a criminal complaint with the PGR against the Sedatu 29 October 2018.
By the specific agreement, Armando Saldaña also denounced before the internal organ of Control of the Sedatu and the PGR that his signature was forged, as well as his boss. However, its process already concluded and the judge found falsification of your header, as explained by the defense of Gonzalez Tiburcio.
The legal team of the Lamar explained the differences between firms is noticed even at first glance, so it will continue giving evidence in the next three months to confirm that his client did not sign the agreement.
Thanks for reading! Help us to continue with our work. How? You can now subscribe to political Animal on Facebook. With your monthly donation, you will receive special content. Find out how to subscribe here. Check our list of frequently asked questions here.

Original source in Spanish