Jorge Valdivia’s lawsuit against Blanco y Negro rejected

The Court of Appeals of Santiago rejected the appeal for nullity deducted against the sentence that accepted the exception of settlement and dismissed the demand for collection of labor benefits filed by Jorge Valdivia against Blanco y Negro.It should be remembered that the “magician”, currently in the Necaxa of Mexico, alleged before the justice a debt of 400 thousand dollars for friendly matches that were not held. In a unanimous ruling, the Twelfth Chamber of the Appellate Court ruled out an error of law in the contested judgment, issued by the First Court of Labor Letters of Santiago, which rejected the claim in all its parts. The opinion maintains that “the basic judge concludes that the accompanying evidence does not support the applicant’s thesis, in terms that the decision rejecting the application is based on the lack of accreditation of elements that determine the concepts that were intended to be claimed by the worker on the occasion of the termination of his employment relationship, which already prevents casual wielding in this section from prospering.” In addition, it adds that “the appellant does not provide this Court with schemes that carry out the analysis of the alleged errors, since he limits himself to affirming that the reservation is clear and precise, ergo, effective and / or valid, without specifying the errors incurred by the sentencer “.” Undoubtedly, it is not enough for an appeal such as the one in question to affirm the existence of errors and not to develop precisely the errors, so that this Court can take charge of them to accept or dismiss them, “complements the resolution.

Original source in Spanish