The case investigating the links between Rosatti’s advisor and Marcelo D’Alessandro passes to Comodoro Py

The federal judge of Santiago del Estero Guillermo Molinari today declared himself incompetent to continue intervening in the case in which the link between Silvio Robles, spokesman for Horacio Rosatti, president of the Supreme Court, and the Minister of Security and Justice of Buenos Aires on leave Marcelo D’Alessandro is investigated. The magistrate argued that since the events would have taken place in CABA, they should be investigated there. In a 6-page ruling, Judge Molinari decided “to declare the incompetence of this Federal Court of Section to continue hearing the present case and order its referral to the Federal Criminal and Correctional Court in turn of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires,” that is, to the federal courts of Comodoro Py. Within the same ruling, he also justified the decision he made days ago when he ordered Robles, Rosatti’s advisor who appears on the cover of the complaint, to hand over his cell phone, noting that it was an indispensable measure to prevent the investigation from being frustrated. The file began from a complaint filed by the governor of Santiago del Estero, Gerardo Zamora, after alleged chat conversations between D’Alessandro and Robles in which they talked about cases in which the Supreme Court of Justice finally intervened with movements in favor of the City of Buenos Aires (Coparticipation) and the opposition (Council of the Magistracy). Molinari decided that the case would go to Comodoro Py because, as the federal prosecutor of Santiago del Estero Pedro Simón had said, the events “would have taken place in the area of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, between officials of the Supreme Court and the Government of the City and for issues related to their functions, reason why this Federal Court of Santiago del Estero, is incompetent for its investigation and trial”. However, he clarified that when he ordered the seizure of Robles’ phone, he did so, also in line with the prosecutor’s opinion, because it was appropriate “to immediately and urgently safeguard the evidence that would serve to found a subsequent accusation or distort the initial suspicion.” In the federal courts of Comodoro Py there are already at least two complaints filed on Tuesday, one by lawyer Gastón Marano and another by Nicolás Giansanti. Both fell to the federal court number 4, led by Ariel Lijo.Marano, is a lawyer who months ago took charge of the defense of Nicolás Gabriel Carrizo, one of the defendants for the attempted murder of Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. He had also advised a senator from Together for Change, Ignacio Torres, within the framework of the bicameral commission to monitor the intelligence agencies.” I have learned, through different media, that Dr. Silvio Federico Robles, who holds the position of Director General, of one of the members of the Supreme Court of the Nation, would have had very inadequate conversations with an official of the Buenos Aires executive, Marcelo D’Alessandro, “Marano said in the complaint. ” These conversations would include advice from the Supreme Court official regarding the best methodologies to achieve a judicial outcome, from the procedural side. I cannot fail to mention, to dispel any doubt regarding the nature in which these ‘advice’ were given, that Dr. Robles does not register registration with the Public Bar Association of the Federal Capital, which allows me to rule out, in principle, that such advice has been provided within the framework of professional advice, “he continued. By the same platform, even if he were enrolled in some other tuition, his character as a public official dependent on the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, would disqualify him from providing advice on cases that could end up before the very body in which he works. With the level of provisionality typical of a complaint, this situation inclines me to think that we could be in the presence of an illicit act, “he said Marano.La second complaint was filed by a person identified as Nicolás Giansanti and was written practically the same terms as Marano’s. “I have learned, through different media, that the accused, who holds the position of Director General of one of the members of the Supreme Court of the Nation, would have held inappropriate conversations with an official of the Buenos Aires executive branch, Marcelo D’Alessandro,” he said. Such discussions would include advice from the Supreme Court appointee on the best methodologies for achieving aJudicial result, from the procedural face. Thus, to clear any doubt I can not fail to mention, that Dr. Robles does not register professional registration of the Public Bar Association of the Federal Capital, which allows me to rule out, in principle, that such advice has been provided within the framework of professional advice, “he added.

Original source in Spanish